Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 2061 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3250 - 206 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 56 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 55 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
36.11676849966056%
Multi-Core
1130
8.242159008023341%
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 2 |
56 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 255 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
