Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2195 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2195 is 1135 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2195
- Performs up to 17% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-4160T - 110 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 36 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2195 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2195 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-2195
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
936
73.182173573104%
Multi-Core
1796
18.006817726087828%
Intel Xeon W-2195 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
