Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon W-2140B on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2126 days newer than Xeon W-2140B.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W-2140B - 166 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-2140B - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2140B doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon W-2140B
Server/Workstation • Dec 21st, 2017
Core i9-14900K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2140B | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 21st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
