Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 465 days newer than Xeon Silver 4116.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 85 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Lost Ark than Xeon Silver 4116 - 268 vs 234 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
268
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$218.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon Silver | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |