Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon Gold 6154 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1024 days newer than Xeon Gold 6154.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Gold 6154
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 36 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon Gold 6154 - 112 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon Gold 6154 - 65 vs 200 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67320 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1201
71.65871121718376%
Multi-Core
9628
100%
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon Gold | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 10 |
36 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
200 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |