Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 902 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5645 - 211 vs 210 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 55 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |