Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 1140 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 80 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5645 - 115 vs 113 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon | Collection | FX |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
