Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790K outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4790K is 1507 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Core i7-4790K - 80 vs 88 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790K
- Performs up to 35% better in Starfield than Xeon E5620 - 58 vs 43 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
58
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$250.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i7-4790K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 88 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |