Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3400 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5620 - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 12 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |