Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 3892 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5530
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 80 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 10% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5530 - 138 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5530 - 48 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
138
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$12.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1670
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,670 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13804 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Gainestown | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 280 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |