Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 4663 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 22% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5520 - 133 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5520 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i9-12900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Gainestown | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
