Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 3441 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5520 - 183 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 32 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1181.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,181.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Gainestown | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |