Buy on Amazon
CA$160.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1640 days newer than Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-3770S - 239 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 44 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-3770S Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770S
Buy for CA$160.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
56.93617021276596%
Multi-Core
2234
23.22486744983886%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
