Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1640 days newer than Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-3770 - 530 vs 469 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 44 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 77 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$153.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76639 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
671
57.1063829787234%
Multi-Core
2299
23.900613369373115%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |