Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 477 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 256 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 62 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | 62 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
