Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 153 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 125 vs 135 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-13600KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
