Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 130 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 112% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 286 vs 135 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
286
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$509
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$509 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13578 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |