Buy on Amazon
CA$32.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 is 272 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1620 - 159 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 55 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65821 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2690
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
71.00694444444444%
Multi-Core
723
21.479500891265594%
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 135 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.