Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 2696 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 23% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 148 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-12700
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
