Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 135 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 26% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 282 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
282
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$728.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$728.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |