Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 8640U outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 8640U is 3376 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 8640U - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- Performs up to 11% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 321 vs 288 FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 28 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1055
42.50604351329573%
Multi-Core
7030
80.16877637130801%
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 8640U |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 28 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
No | Overclockable | No |