Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 730 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 146 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
146
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |