Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 15% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 586 vs 508 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-13700K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 16 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
