Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v2 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v2 is 728 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Performs up to 6% better in Rust than Celeron G530 - 159 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
