Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 848 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 259 vs 243 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 60 vs 160 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2687W v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2687W v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1030
70.93663911845731%
Multi-Core
6832
100%
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 160 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
