Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 127 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 65 vs 150 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
127
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$214.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 487 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |