Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2427 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 181 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 65 vs 150 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$265
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
624
37.365269461077844%
Multi-Core
4022
69.42862074918004%
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |