Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 36% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 132 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 32 vs 28 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$669.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$669.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |