Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1212 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2680 - 530 vs 507 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
530
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$234.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$234.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
542
41.91802010827533%
Multi-Core
3336
80.57971014492755%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |