Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3612 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2680 - 131 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 58 vs 130 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |