Buy on Amazon
CA$1,149.12
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2402 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2680 - 150 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 24 vs 16 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60979 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2680
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
542
42.54317111459969%
Multi-Core
3336
44.754494231285214%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.