Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 2381 days older than Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium Gold G6405 - 99 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 58 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
97
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |