Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 115 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 104% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 155 vs 76 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
155
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |