Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900T outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900T - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900T
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 201 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900T |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 15.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |