Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1068NG7 outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-1068NG7 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1068NG7
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 28 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Server/Workstation
Core i7-1068NG7
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Ice Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1526 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
