Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 83% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 565 vs 308 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
565
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$489
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |