Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 1867 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 105 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 190 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 28 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1400
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |