Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 115 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2670 - 132 vs 111 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$363.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$363.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |