Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600T outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600T is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600T
- Performs up to 34% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2670 - 155 vs 116 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2670
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-14600T
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
