Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 168 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 65 vs 115 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
168
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
497
34.18156808803301%
Multi-Core
3408
76.20751341681574%
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |