Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2418 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2667 - 125 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$213.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$213.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |