Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1705 days newer than Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-650 - 98 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 73 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$56.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65454 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-650 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |