Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4460 is 120 days older than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 699 vs 693 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 84 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
699
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60978 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
922
87.72597526165556%
Multi-Core
3652
100%
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 84 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |