Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 829 days newer than Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3570 - 124 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 77 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
121
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$62.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$62.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |