Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2136 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 135 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 11% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 217 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1987.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,987.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |