Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-2665 - 239 vs 223 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
239
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$312.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$312.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18747 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
115 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |