Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 4292 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 14% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2660 - 242 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 28 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
442
17.851373182552503%
Multi-Core
2635
24.929044465468305%
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
