Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7645HX is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2660 - 194 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 5 7645HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
442
16.50485436893204%
Multi-Core
2635
22.366522366522368%
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
