Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 13% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 185 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
518
18.96741120468693%
Multi-Core
3208
20.373428172234217%
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
