Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v2 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v2 is 690 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Performs up to 33% better in League of Legends than FX-8150 - 73 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
55
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |